Category: #icaewchartoftheweek

Our chart this week provides an insight into why Stagecoach and Virgin decided to ‘hand back the keys’.  

The East Coast franchise generated £247m in 2016-17, before a franchise payment to the Department of Transport of £272m. A net loss of £25m. The losses were likely to grow in the future because the payment for the franchise was due to increase significantly over the new few years at the same time as revenues are stalling. 

Franchise revenue of £820m in 2016-17 included £741m from passengers at an average fare of £34.23 per journey or 13p per km travelled, while direct costs of £573m comprised £158m in staff costs, £117m in track access charges, £93m for rolling stock, £22m on fuel, and £183m in other costs. 

The problem for the government is that this is supposed to be one of the financially viable rail franchises.  However, the government’s subsidies and losses on the East Coast routes were £289m in 2016-17, more than the £272m it received as a franchise payment from Stagecoach and Virgin.  It really needs this particular franchise to generate more money than it does. 

The challenge for government is whether it can make do and mend, or whether the entire franchising model needs to be revisited.

This week’s chart is perhaps the most interesting, if more complex ones, from our recent report ‘The debt of nations’.

https://www.icaew.com/about-icaew/regulation-and-the-public-interest/policy/public-sector-finances/debt-of-nations

Out of the 12 most indebted countries, it shows the UK has had the greatest growth in general government net debt in proportion to government revenues, up from 0.86 in 2001 to 2.20 times in 2018. This is a concern as the UK will be much less resilient to economic shocks. 

At the other end of the scale, Canada has seen its indebtedness rise more slowly than its government revenues, with net debt going from equivalent to a year’s revenue in 2001 down to 0.59 in 2018. 

While admiring Canada’s fiscal rectitude (albeit supported by a natural resources boom) the continued growth in public debt for the major developed economies raises question about whether this is sustainable in countries such as the US and the UK. 

This is particularly a worry for the US, where general government net debt has increased from 1.05 times government revenue to 2.55 times this year, even before taking in account recent tax cuts and additional spending pledges. 

The news that interest rates in Argentina have just hit 40% should give policy makers in the major developed nations some pause for thought about the risks they are running by borrowing so much.

Our chart this week again comes from our recently published report: The debt of nations – definitely worth a read. 

The usual measure used to compare borrowing between countries is the ratio of net public debt to GDP.  We do not think this is a good measure: there are problems with the way GDP is calculated and GDP also fails to reflect the financial positions of different governments. 

We prefer the ratio of net public debt to the government revenues actually available to service that debt. Our chart this week shows this ratio for the 12 most indebted nations – ranging from Canada with a ratio of 0.59 (less than one year’s revenues) through to Japan, which owes 3.73 times the revenue its government expects to receive in 2018. 

This ratio also takes into account different fiscal approaches.  E.g. France’s net debt to GDP ratio of 89% is greater than the UK’s 81%, but it has a significantly lower net debt to revenue ratio of 1.69 times compared with 2.20 for the UK. The UK’s lower level of tax as a proportion of the economy means it has less money available to service its public debt. 

Why isn’t Japan bust? Negative real interest rates means it is expected to have an interest bill of close to zero this year.

Our chart this week is from our report ‘the debt of nations’ published last week which we hope will be a ‘must-read’ for anyone affected by how our governments manage public debt; in other words everyone. 

Low interest rates mean that nominal interest on the UK’s almost £2tn of public debt is expected to fall to 1.8% over the next few years as existing debt is refinanced. With yields on 10-year fixed-interest gilts at the end of March of 1.35%, this forecast seems quite reasonable based on current refinancing plans. 

However, over a quarter (28%) of the UK’s public debt is index-linked. If inflation increases then the cost of borrowing will rise accordingly.

And although the UK Debt Management Office has been issuing debt for longer and longer maturities to lock-in low rates, a substantial proportion has been swapped by the Bank of England into variable rate debt as a result of quantitative easing. 

A return to 5%, the base rate in 2008 before the financial crisis, would cost an extra £20bn a year, roughly half the defence budget.

This poses a dilemma to the Bank of England. Unwind QE too quickly and interest rates could rise significantly. But, don’t unwind QE and the public finances will remain exposed for many years to come.

Ross Campbell, Director of Public Sector for ICAEW, writes:

“This week’s chart is on the subject of debt. Public debt.

This is the subject of a forthcoming report in the ICAEW’s Better Government Series, which examines the level of public debt around the world. It is not a pretty picture, with general government net debt (the most widely used measure) tripling since 2001 to reach almost £30tn this year.

According to data provided by the IMF, there are 76 indebted countries that together owe £42tn in gross debt, which nets to £29.4tn once cash and liquid financial assets are taken into account. £26.3tn or 90% of this is owed by just 12 countries – the US, Japan, Italy, France, the UK, Germany, Spain, Brazil, Mexico, Belgium, Canada and the Netherlands.

Proportionately, the UK has borrowed the most of the major developed countries, with an average annual increase over the last 17 years of 9.9%, followed by the US with 9.3%. This compares with more modest increases of 2.3% a year on average for Germany and 0.4% for Canada.

A decade after the corporate debt crisis, public debt is at an all-time high and continues to rise. The next debt crisis may well be one of public debt.

Do watch out for our report – it makes for a fascinating (and sobering) read.”

To comment on the ICAEW chart of the week, visit the ICAEW Talk Accountancy blog by clicking here.

Ross Campbell, Director for Public Sector at ICAEW writes:

“With international relations a little fractious currently and talk of a trade war in the press, this week’s chart look at what is at stake in terms of the scale of global trade.

Exports are certainly important to the major trading countries, including the US, the EU, China and Japan, which together make up just over 70% of the global economy. As a proportion of the economic activity (compared to projected 2018 GDP) exports range from 14% for the USA to 20% for China. 

The three largest economies each export in excess of £2tn of goods and services a year. While as a percentage of economic activity this may not seem that much,   it is important to realise that the public sector makes up from 40% to 50% of the economic activity of developed economies, so exports represent a much larger share of private sector activity.  

Furthermore, disruption to the complex supply chains that are so important to global trade could have a multiplier effect on economic activity, and not in a good way.

Of course, not all of the noise made by politicians turns into anything real. Let’s hope the war of words between the US and China doesn’t become an actual trade war, as a world of strong economies needs more, not less, international trade to thrive.”

To comment on the ICAEW chart of the week, visit the ICAEW Talk Accountancy blog by clicking here.

Ross Campbell, Director for Public Sector at ICAEW, writes:

“Our chart this week looks where the government gets its money, or at least the element that comes in in the form of income tax, which is expected to generate around £173bn in 2017-18.

It is important to note that income tax constitutes only 24% of total government income, so this chart does not represent the full picture of how much is contributed by different groups.

The highest earning 10% (5% of the total population) contribute £102bn, almost 60% of total income tax, while the top 1% of earners pay £48bn (28%).

As a ‘progressive’ tax, the average tax rate paid by each group goes up with income, increasing from 10% for the bottom half of income tax payers (earning less than £25k).

In comparison other taxes such as national insurance, council tax and VAT are considered “regressive”, with poorer households paying a much greater proportion of their earnings on these taxes.

Interestingly, despite the impression given by a top marginal rate of 45%, the overall amount collected by income tax is just 16% of the total personal income of £1,050bn declared on tax returns and PAYE submissions.”

To comment on the ICAEW chart of the week, visit the ICAEW Talk Accountancy blog by clicking here.

Ross Campbell, Director for Public Sector at ICAEW, writes:

“Following last week’s chart on the changing profile of public spending, our chart this week shows how taxes have changed over the past sixty years.

Despite income tax rates being lower, the overall share from taxes on income has actually increased. Although income tax and corporation tax have declined as a proportion of total tax, the increase in national insurance (another form of income tax) more than makes up the difference.  

However, the most dramatic shift has been in customs duties. These are now less than 1% of total tax receipts, compared with the 18% they generated back in the day. At the same time, local taxation in the form of business rates and council tax (which replaced domestic property rates) has declined to less than a tenth of the total.

The revenues from these taxes have largely been replaced by VAT, now a fifth of the total, together with a plethora of new taxes, including insurance premium tax, environmental levies, air passenger duty and the bank levy to name just a few.

With tax receipts (excluding other income) in 2018-19 equivalent to 34% of GDP, compared to 31% in 1988-89 and 30% in 1958-59, the shift over time demonstrates a key principle of taxation: if one tax doesn’t get you, another one will.”

To comment on the ICAEW chart of the week, visit the ICAEW Talk Accountancy blog by clicking here.

Ross Campbell, Director for Public Sector at ICAEW, writes:

“With the Spring Statement already drifting into memory, our chart this week, shows how the profile of public spending has changed over the last 60 years. 

It shows how back in 1958-59, the government spent less than a quarter of its budget on welfare (including pensions) and health, but today spending in those areas has increased to around 54% of total spending.

The consequence is that the proportion of the total available to spend on all other public services has decreased significantly, with defence having had the largest reduction over time.

Because we are all living longer, spending has been increasing on pensions, health, and social care in particular. The demographic projections mean that this trend is likely to continue over the next 30 years as we continue to age as a society.

If the past is any guide to the future, the trend of successive governments choosing to prioritise health, welfare and pensions over other spending is likely to continue. So don’t expect the pressure on public spending to let up anytime soon…”

To comment on the ICAEW chart of the week, visit the ICAEW Talk Accountancy blog by clicking here.

Our chart this week illustrates why some prudence in forecasting makes sense, given how the official forecasts for 2018-19 have changed significantly over a fairly short period of time.

The current forecast of £37bn may be £3bn better than the previous forecast and £10bn better than the shock Autumn Statement of 2016, but it is still £35bn below the original forecast made in December 2013 and is £42bn worse than the forecast of a surplus of £5bn made only three years ago.

The good news around the Chancellor’s Spring Statement was that he pretty much kept his promise of not announcing any fiscal policy changes. The numbers in the short-term are also slightly better, with a £5bn and £3bn improvements in the fiscal deficit expected for 2017-18 and 2018-19 respectively.

The bad news is that the medium-term economic forecasts remain extremely pessimistic and austerity continues. 

This caution shown by the Chancellor and the OBR is driven by concern over the continued economic weakness, Brexit uncertainties and the inherent risks attached to making forecasts.

After all, Philip Hammond is not the first Chancellor to announce that public debt (as a percentage of GDP) has peaked and will start falling from now on…